BOOK REVIEW
The
book that I chose to review is the High-Tech
Heretic by Clifford Stoll. The goal of the
book was to draw attention to
some of the contradictory issues of some of the
education reform and solutions
being proposed and the slippery slope that is
computer technology.
The book was an easy read. It was witty and
full of sarcasm. It pokes fun at the nonsensical
political ideas floating
around masquerading as a better education regime. It
opened my eye to some of
the pit falls of relying on computers to a great
degree. I did not really think
about some of the skills that might be lost to this
generation of students that
are being brought up in this computer age. Skills
such as literacy, critical
thinking, how to do basic arithmetic, which was
discussed in the chapter
calculating against calculators, and the deeper
understanding of concepts and
natural systems that you can get through experience.
Everyone talks about
making learning fun but fail to see that some things
are learned from drills
and homework practice. It is not preachy but just
shows the holes in some of
the arguments supporting computers in classroom from
pre-school to high school.
On
the flip side to this book, it talks about finding a
balance between computers
and education but does not offer any solution to the
dilemma. It would have
been nice to get some insight on how to balance the
presence and use of
computers in the classroom. For example, that per
school and kindergarten kids
won’t appreciate the value of computer when they
most prefer painting with
their hands, or that doing a science project using a
computer without any
originality or creativity in the project is stifling
to innovation. Some clue
as to how this balance can occur would go a long way
with the protest against
having computers in the classroom.
For me
personally, I will be more circumspect
in how my students present their work. I am a
scientist and will be teaching
biology and chemistry, and I did not learn my craft
from just computer or
playing with simulations on a computer. I had to do
the actual work, see it
with my eyes, feel it, and breathe it. I want that
for my students as well. I do
not want just knowledge but knowing and
understanding. I want them to be
critical thinkers always thinking about what is
next, how to do better. I want
them to be adaptable. Science is adaptable and
requires an agile mind or it
will go stagnant. I agree with some of the argument
within this book. Such as
literacy is on the decline, basic arithmetic and
times table are not being
encourage due to over use of a calculator. It sends
a bad message of getting
things right here and now and it can translate into
all aspect of life. I would
limit the use of computer in my class to only doing
papers or research a topic.
I would want my students to show their thought
process, how they came to the
answer not just regurgitate what they were told.
Computers are great for data
collection but it’s all in proper use and not for
short cuts or easy answers.
Over all it was a good read and I would recommend it
to my fellows as an eye
opener to second guess how we assign work and choose
our assessments with these
failings in mind.