L. Silverman
Middle States Retention Task
Force
Sub-Committee Examining
Current/Existing Programs
and Efforts Fostering
Student Retention
(REVISED and UPDATED)
Kevin Birth, Diane Forté,
Caroline Rupprecht, Laura Silverman
In an effort for us as educators and higher education professionals to better understand through self-study the factors that influence student retention and contribute to the future development of effective strategies and programs to reduce attrition at the College, the Middle States Retention Sub-Committee on Existing Programs has prepared this initial examination of the retention- related initiatives and programs that are currently threaded throughout the institution.
In order to better organize and present this information, we have divided our inquiry into three areas:
•Academics
•Academic Support Services
•Student
Affairs
ACADEMICS
Current Retention Efforts by Academic Departments and Faculty
1. Foster an overall sense of community by:
a.) Organizing events such as Open Houses, End-of-Semester Parties, lectures with invited speakers, and conferences that include student participation.
b.) Publishing student journals; exhibit and showcase students’ creative works.
c.) Providing physical spaces, such as lounges, where students can meet and study.
2. Foster an overall coherent learning experience by:
a.) Designing curricula based on faculty research, in keeping with the college’s mission of a liberal arts education.
b.) Designing synthesis courses with faculty from other departments.
c.) Co-listing courses with other departments and programs.
3. Attract students to their major by:
a.) Informing them about the department via web sites and flyers; and participating in events such as the Major/Minor Fair.
b.) Explicitly defining the nature of their disciplines in the classroom.
c.) Drawing attention to their major during transfer credit evaluations.
4. Support their current majors by:
a.) Designing a curriculum that enables them to complete their major (and offering those courses accordingly).
b.) Offering awards and providing recommendations. In some cases, offering credit for professional internships.
c.) Providing opportunities to meet alumni from the department.
5. Provide personal support of students on an individual basis by:
a.) Advising students on how to fulfill requirements, apply for graduate school, etc.
b.) Being available to meet and/or communicate with students outside office hours (full-time faculty only).
(See additional information on retention efforts by academic departments in separate section.)
ACADEMIC SUPPORT SERVICES
Current Retention Efforts by offices and programs that bolster and support students’ academic studies and the College’s goals and targets.
Dr. Howard Kleinmann,
Director
As the motto “We learn in order
to serve” (Discimus ut serviamus) expresses the mission of
Academic support services including the following: the Writing Lab and e-tutoring; Science Tutoring Center; language lab; mathematics lab; Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC); College English a Second Language (CESL) classes and immersion programs; Academic Support lab with tutoring for reading and study skills (including workshops in note-taking, textbook reading, reading books without headings, reading journal articles, organizing information for study, making oral presentations, time management, taking objective tests, taking essay tests); networked computers for school-related use; speed-reading video tapes; study carrels; CUNY Proficiency Exam (CPE) preparation; and free tutoring in specific content courses.
We accept the primacy of English reading and writing skills for functioning effectively in the academy and the society in which it is embedded. It is these skills that we seek to develop in our students so that they may comprehend, analyze, and communicate ideas, and become contributing members of the wider community.
The department recognizes the multilingual and multicultural composition of its students and, in particular, the special needs of students for whom English is a second language. We strive to address not only the language needs of ESL students but their overall academic advisement needs as well by creating a supportive environment in which they can request and receive professional assistance.
We view the development of English literacy skills as an ongoing process, requiring attention in different ways throughout a student’s college experience. Thus, we strive to support the learning activities not only of basic skills students but also of all students.
The department seeks to address the literacy, communication, and study skills needs of students through course offerings, independent study, individual and small-group tutoring, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), video, and other innovative instructional formats (e.g., paired courses, workshops, theme-based classes).
The department recognizes the potential of emerging technologies (e.g., CAI, CD-ROM) and seeks to evaluate, test, and integrate such instructional innovations in its programs. We view familiarizing students with the technology as important not only for the development of their literacy skills but as an educational asset in and of itself.
The department accepts its responsibility to administer, score, and report the results of assessment tests mandated by the University and the College in order that students can be placed at the appropriate level of instruction, receive the necessary support to maximize the likelihood of persistence and retention in the College, and have a successful academic experience.
Writing Center Statistics
(based on Spring 2005 and Fall 2005)
●60 tutoring appointments per week plus 25-30 drop-in tutoring sessions per week
●1000-1100 tutoring hours per semester
●110 e-tutoring submissions per semester (excluding Task 2 CPE e-tutoring)
15% of tutees are in CESL courses;
05% of tutees are in English 095.0;
32% of tutees are in English 110;
11% of tutees are in English 120;
18% of tutees are in Writing Intensive courses;
20% of tutees are in other courses.
33% of tutees are freshmen
20% of tutees are sophomores;
25% of tutees are juniors;
13% of tutees are seniors;
8% of tutees are Graduate Students.
Academic Support Lab Statistics (2005)
●Approximately 40,000 student visits to the lab per year
●Reading/ESL tutoring: 85 students
per year
●Content tutoring in non-science courses:
330 students per year
●Content tutoring in science courses:
275 students per year
●Study Skills Workshops: 320 students
per year
CPE Miniclasses: 185 students per
year
CPE Intensive Class: 20 students per
year
CPE tutoring: 35 students per year
CPE e-tutoring: 15 submissions per semester for Task 2 of the CPE
The strength of the ASC is very
much tied to the amount and quality of interaction with academic departments
and programs whose students rely on our services. Rather than wait for departments and programs
to approach us, we have taken an active role in reaching out to them to inform
them of our services and explore ways in which we can work collaboratively to
assist our students. Such outreach on
our part cannot be overstated. We need
to do more of it. We need to have the
Director of the
Presently the Director of the
Over the last few years, we have been developing our content area-tutoring program. The ASC offers tutoring in a selection of gateway courses, writing-intensive courses, and other offerings across the curriculum. We inaugurated our Science Tutoring Center (STC) last year, in which tutorial support in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics is offered. But space is a problem. We have outgrown the meager space that has been allocated to us for the STC, and the space in which we conduct tutoring for courses in the Social Sciences and Humanities is overflowing with students. We need to address the space problem for these programs, which are in high demand, so that they can continue to grow.
The ASL has demonstrated its
effectiveness in basic skills preparation through its immersion and ESL programs,
CPE preparation through its various intervention types (workshops,
mini-classes, intensive classes), writing support in the
Having met the University standards for basic skills is not to say that such students are fully prepared to engage the undergraduate curriculum. Students require ongoing support in their general education courses to succeed at higher levels. We need to further develop tutorial support across the curriculum. Such development, however, depends on expanded collaborations between the ASC and academic departments, appropriate physical space, and staff time to develop such linkages.
Most of the content courses that are supported are 100-level courses that students take as they are beginning a major. Students often seek assistance in 200- and 300-level courses, which presently is unavailable. Expanding content tutoring to serve the “forgotten” sophomores would offer uninterrupted support for students as they move into their majors.
Consideration should be given to embedding teaching assistants in targeted lecture classes. The assistants could meet with students immediately after or before class to model appropriate study strategies and answer questions on the spot. Courses such as Biology 107 and Chemistry 113, which have a limited number of sections taught in a large lecture format and have low rates of successful completion, would be excellent candidates for such an initiative.
We need to
continue to reach out to academic departments for ideas on what support
services could best serve their students, and departments need to collaborate
with the ASC in designing and delivering academic support services to
students. In the past we have offered
some Math workshops for introductory Chemistry and Physics courses with mixed
success. This is an area that is still
worth developing in cooperation with the academic departments.
Adult Collegiate Education
Program (ACE)
Ms. Elizabeth
Hennessey, Acting Director
The program was based on the conviction, relatively new in higher education at that time, that a college education should be available to all who want it – whatever their age. At its inception, ACE was one of the very few special baccalaureate programs for adults in this country, and as such, ACE has been defining education for adults for over 40 year by building on a rich adult experience with a balanced program in the arts, natural sciences, and social sciences. ACE is committed to the idea that learning is a life-long adventure. ACE is also aware that adults are busy with family, jobs, and community involvement, so scheduling, counseling services, and the pace are all tuned to adult needs.
The foundation of the ACE Program is a special series of basic ACE Seminars in the liberal arts. These courses satisfy most of the College’s primary college competency and liberal arts and science requirements. After completion of these seminars, the ACE student can then apply for up to 36 tuition-free Life Achievement credits. The student then chooses a field of concentrated study – the major. While working on the major, the student will complete the remaining requirements in the following areas: foreign language (or an alternate plan), physical education, and, finally, the ACE student takes electives from all across the curriculum to bring the total credits up to 120 for graduation and the baccalaureate degree.
Currently there are 564 students enrolled in the ACE program. Our Fall 2005, Spring and Summer 2006 graduates total 58 females and 21 males.
All ACE applicants are considered
direct admit students. ACE applicants do
not filter their applications through the central admitting CUNY Office of
Application Processing Center. They
forward their application directly to the ACE office which keeps the
application on file until all applicant requirements have been are met. These include the requirement of passing or
waiver of the CUNY Assessment Tests.
Students are counseled as to when to test and follow-up takes place in
the event of passing or failing. If
failure occurs in any of the three areas of
Upon being admitted, all first-semester freshmen and transfer ACE students are registered by the ACE department, thus enabling the adult to adapt as seamlessly as possible into the new environment of college. There is an orientation held prior to registration which advises students on what to expect in the world of college; important dates; identification of buildings; tours etc.,
In collaboration with the
College’s
Additionally, ACE students are uniquely offered the opportunity to apply for Life Achievement credits. The decision to grant or to not grant credits (after initial completion of 36 ACE required credits) is made by academic departments upon receipt and review of a student portfolio. Each work is documented and backed by proof of completion of task and knowledge gained from completion. Students are offered a workshop once each semester in which they are fully advised on the application process for Life Achievement Credits.
An open door policy is on going in the ACE office with the director/staff and the ACE population. Evening office hours (Wednesday, 5 – 7pm) are available to ACE students when classes are in session, which is in common with other administrative offices such as Admissions; Financial Aid; Registrar etc. Advising is available three full days a week, a well as on Wednesday evenings in the Center on an appointment or drop-in basis.
There are no current resources/efforts to track ACE student progress and retention.
Additional Thoughts on Student Progress and Retention
There is a need for student
tracking in terms of the ACE population, their progress, and their
retention. This could possibly be
implemented with the new Degree Works program whereby the ACE office would,
perhaps each semester, download the ACE students cumulative grade point
averages and registration norms with the idea of offering guidance and/or
setting up academic assistance to those who are in jeopardy or heading in that
direction. The Office of Academic Skills
and/or the Learning Lab could possibly play a more significant role in the life
of the ACE student at
Another thought would be to incorporate a new introductory course, which would be a required by all adults who have been away from academics for a to-be-determined number of years. This course would offer skills preparation in areas such as writing, library usage, internet use for research, and conversation/discussion groups and the like.
Massive recruiting events are
needed in the area of gaining new adults into the ACE program at
Ms. Laura
A. Silverman, Director
The
Since its inception in 1995, the Advising Center has significantly and exponentially expanded in terms of its charges and mandates, scope of activities, volume of those whom it serves, and quantity of personnel (particularly part-timers). In general terms, the Center’s team of professionals negotiate and articulate on behalf of undergraduate students the College’s requirements, procedures, and academic offerings; and, most notably, as above-mentioned, following fall and spring admissions, the Center is the primary point of entry for new freshmen, transfers, and re-entering students via our orientation, advising, and registration programs.
In its
provision of services to new students,
Additionally,
the
• A dedicated new student phone line (718-997-5573) for incoming students to call to get information/sign up for workshops (freshmen, transfer, re-entry, reactivating).
• Outreach to and preparation for admitted students prior to their registration: includes determining testing placements, exemptions and waivers, immunization status, transfer credit evaluations, anticipated majors, holds and stops.
• Collaborative new-student advising and registration programs: offer special groups a forum for and our assistance with incoming students (Time 2000, Honors Experience, CESL, etc.).
• 100% of all entering freshmen
attend an advising and registration workshop where they are introduced to the
College, general education requirements, programs of study, and other academic
offerings and opportunities. Expanded to
include students’ families through collaboration with Student Affairs for five
sessions in June. The remaining
workshops are conducted solely by the
Freshman Orientation and Registration Workshops
– Fall 2005
Date of
Registration Number
of Students
Registered Totals
|
|
138 |
138 |
|
|
138 |
276 |
|
|
141 |
417 |
|
|
175 |
592 |
|
|
190 |
782 |
Total for June
(Including |
|
809 |
|
|
138 |
947 |
|
|
88 |
1035 |
|
|
97 |
1132 |
|
|
59 |
1191 |
|
|
69 |
1260 |
|
First Week of Classes (1 wkshp day) |
64 |
1324 |
Total Freshmen Registered Fall ‘05
|
1,324 |
1,324 |
Date
of Registration ` Number
of Students Totals
Registered
|
|
29 |
29 |
|
|
31 |
60 |
|
|
33 |
93 |
|
1st week of school and One Stop Admissions Programs (1 wksp per day) |
35 |
128 |
Total
|
128 |
128 |
• After having attended an orientation session, new freshmen can only make changes to their schedules with advisor accompaniment. This prevents incorrect registration into higher-level classes for which they do not have prerequisites, proper maintenance of FYI communities, correct course placement, attempted and encouraged full-time retention in courses, overall retention at the College, and encouraged maintenance of 15-credit schedules (or, if registered for fewer, the addition of credit to create full-time or 15-credit schedules after discussion of the pros and cons of doing so).
• New transfers offered flexible workshop options. The workshop presentation covers all aspects of the College’s general education degree requirements, major requirements, the transfer credit and evaluation processes, the telephone and on-line registration systems, how to navigate tuition, financial aid, books, parking, ID cards, grading policies, graduation with honors, and information on special programs.
Fall 2005 Transfer Advising
Workshop Statistics
Workshop date Time
# Attended Special Program
Friday, May 6th 10:00am 39 NCC/QCC
Friday, May 13th 10:00am 22 NCC/QCC
Thursday,
May 19th 10:00am 33
Monday,
May 23rd
Tuesday,
May 24th 10:00am 18
Thursday,
May 26th 10:00am 26
Monday,
June 6th
Thursday,
June 9th
Monday,
June 13th
Tuesday
June 14th
Thursday,
June 16th
Monday,
June 20th
Thursday,
June 23rd
Monday,
June 27th
Thursday,
June 30th
Monday,
July 11th
Thursday,
July 14th
Fall 2005 Transfer Advising
Workshop Statistics (continued)
Workshop date Time # Attended Special Program
Monday,
July 18th
Thursday,
July 21st
Monday,
July 25th
Thursday,
July 28th
Monday,
August 8th
Thursday,
August 11th
Monday,
August 15th
Tuesday,
August 16th
Thursday,
August 18th
Friday,
August 19th
Monday,
August 22nd
Thursday,
August 25th
Friday,
August 26th
Totals 30 Workshops 1064
First week of
school:
Workshop
date
Time # Attended
Monday,
August 29th
Monday,
August 29th
Tuesday,
August 30th
Tuesday,
August 30th
Wednesday,
August 31st
Wednesday,
August 31st
Thursday,
September 1st
Thursday,
September 1st
Friday,
September 2nd
Friday,
September 2nd
Totals 10
Workshops 180
Grand Total ` 40 Workshops 1244
Comparison
Statistics
Fall ’04 33
Workshops 1063
Fall ’05 40
Workshops 1244
Difference: +7 Workshops +181
Spring 2006 Transfer
Advising Workshops
Workshop date Time # Attended Special
Program
Friday, Dec. 2nd
Friday, Dec. 9th
Friday,
Dec. 16th
Monday,
Dec. 19th
Thursday
Dec. 22nd
Monday
Jan. 2nd
Thursday,
Jan. 5th
Monday,
Jan. 9th
Tuesday,
Jan. 10th
Wednesday,
Jan 11th
Thursday,
Jan. 12th
Spring 2006 Transfer
Advising Workshop Statistics (continued)
Workshop date Time # Attended Special
Program
Tuesday,
Jan. 17th
Thursday,
Jan.19th
Monday,
Jan. 23rd
Tuesday,
Jan. 24th
Totals 15Workshops 723
First week of
school:
Workshop
date
Time # Attended Special
Program
Thursday
Jan. 26th
Thursday,
Jan. 26th 2::00pm 28
Friday,
Jan. 27th
Friday,
Jan. 27th
2::00pm 26
Monday,
Jan. 30th
Monday,
Jan. 30th
Tuesday,
Jan.31st
Tuesday,
Jan. 31st
Wednesday,
Feb. 1st
Wednesday,
Feb. 1st
Totals 10
Workshops 164
Grand Total 25
Workshops 887
Comparison Statistics
Spring ’05 26 Workshops 623
Spring ’06 25Workshops 887
Difference: -1 Workshop +264
• Through workshops, transfers are given an opportunity to register with advisor accompaniment as well as take care of as much new-student business as possible while on campus, i.e., bill pay-ment, ID cards, books, etc. through collaboration with these service offices.
• Transfer Class Reservation Program (saving seats in high-demand, “gateway to the major” courses). The Center works with academic departments to save seats in high-demand courses for incoming transfers through our Transfer Student Class Reservation Program
• Faculty-Assisted Transfer
Workshops; a pilot program for Spring 2006 entrants that brought faculty
assistance from ten high-demand majors to one location to assist academic
advisors with transfer student advising and registration.
Faculty – assisted Transfer Workshops/Faculty
Advising
Please note that the numbers do not reflect actual
number of students; rather, as some majors are interdisciplinary, figures
reflect number of necessary advising interactions with faculty.
|
Date |
Acct |
Bio |
Chem |
Comp Sci |
Econ/BBA |
Engl |
FNES |
Phys Ed |
Math |
Elem Ed |
Ling |
DayTotal |
|
Jan 5th |
14 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
17 |
11 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
70 |
|
Jan 12th |
31 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
13 |
6 |
0 |
11 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
90 |
|
Jan 19th |
34 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
11 |
5 |
12 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
3 |
102 |
|
Jan 24th |
24 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
2 |
74 |
|
Program
total |
103 |
25 |
19 |
20 |
49 |
24 |
21 |
15 |
30 |
22 |
8 |
336 |
• Special and advising and
registration workshops for transfers from our two top feeder schools,
Queensborough and
• A mechanism for Re-entries. Through workshops, we help re-entries re-acclimate to the institution and register—including those matriculated under curricula prior to LASAR–as well as assisting them in creating a long-term academic plan and graduation projection.
• Increased advising
availability for non-traditional students: Center is open five days a week with
expanded evening hours three nights a week until
DAY OFFICE HOURS SERVICE SERVICE HOURS
Monday
(including
ACE)
Tuesdays
(including
ACE)
Wednesdays
(including
ACE)
Thursdays
Fridays
•Unevaluated
Transfer Credit Intervention (done in collaboration with Transfer Credit
Evaluation Programs organized by Admissions Office)
•English 110 Intervention - a program to ensure completion of this very important college requirement early in the college career; guaranteed placement into English 110 for second-semester freshmen and collaborative program with Academic Support for students transitioning from CESL)
Fall 2005 English 110 Intervention
Students who complete more than 60 credits w/o
English 110 45
Students who completed 45 – 59 credits w/o English
110 33
Students who had 0 – 27 completed credits w/o
English 110 212
CESL students ready to transition into English 110 60
Total 350
Spring 2006 English 110 Intervention
Students who complete more than 60 credits w/o
English 110 41
Students who completed 45 – 59 credits w/o English
110 26
Students who had 0 – 27 completed credits w/o
English 110 31
CESL students ready to transition into English 110 83
Total 181
Continuing Student Volume Statistics Fall 2005
THE ADVISING
CENTER AT
|
MONTH |
WALK-INS |
APPTS |
TRANSFER WORKSHOPS |
FRESHMAN WORKSHOPS |
SOPHOMORE WORKSHOPS |
ENGLISH 110 REGISTRATION |
MONTHLY TOTALS |
|
DECEMBER |
201 |
167 |
SEE TRANSFER REPORT |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
368 |
|
NOVEMBER |
891 |
251 |
N/A |
30 x 8= 240 2ND SEMESTER
FRESHMAN WORKSHOPS |
71 |
163 |
1616 |
|
OCTOBER |
242 |
164 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
406 |
|
SEPTEMBER |
373 |
79 |
SEE TRANSFER REPORT |
SEE FRESHMAN REPORT |
126 |
N/A |
578 |
|
AUGUST, JULY & JUNE |
NEW-STUDENT
WORKSHOP MONTHS FALL 2005 ENTRANTS |
See separate reports |
|||||
|
TOTAL CONTINUING STUDENTS SEEN FALL 2005 |
2968 |
||||||
FALL SEMESTER 2005
NOTE: For the months of September
through November there are several days in which the college was closed or
there were “no classes” were scheduled.
With that in mind the numbers of continuing students seen during these
said months are affected. The following
is a list of those days:
|
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
|
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
|
Ø
Ø
|
Continuing Student Volume Statistics Spring 2006
THE ADVISING
CENTER AT
|
MONTH |
WALK-INS |
APPTS |
TRANSFER WORKSHOPS |
FRESHMAN WORKSHOPS |
SOPHOMORE WORKSHOPS |
ENGLISH 110 REGISTRATION |
MONTHLY TOTALS |
|
MAY |
410 |
103 |
See Transfer Report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
513 |
|
APRIL |
347 |
114 |
N/A |
90 Second Semester Freshman Workshop |
N/A |
N/A |
551 |
|
MARCH |
323 |
172 |
N/A |
N/A |
65 |
55 |
615 |
|
FEBRUARY |
266 |
90 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
356 |
|
JANUARY |
NEW-STUDENT
WORKSHOPS MONTH FOR SPRING 2006 ENTRANTS |
See separate report |
|||||
|
TOTAL CONTINUING STUDENTS SEEN SPRING 2006 |
2035 |
||||||
|
TOTAL CONTINUING STUDENTS FOR ACDADEMIC 2005 - 2006à |
5003 |
||||||
SPRING SEMESTER 2006
NOTE: For the months of February
through May there are several days in which the College was closed or there
were “no classes” were schedule. With
that in mind the numbers of continuing students seen during these said months
are affected. The following is a list of
those days:
|
Ø
Ø
Ø
|
Ø
Ø
Ø
|
|
• Academic 2005 – 2006 Undeclared Majors Intervention. Number of advising letters sent to students who did not declare their majors:
Students who completed more than 60 credits 747
Students who completed 45- 59 credits 573
Total
1315
• Sophomore Initiative Program including the Sophomore Milestones workshops; The Sophomore Initiative focuses on the sophomore student population in transitioning from freshmen activities to the completion of general educational requirements/LASARs. It is a goal that by the end of the sophomore year, students declare majors that match their interests. “The Sophomore Road Map” (see attached) was established as a visual guide to assist student on a successful path to academic consideration and success and the "Sophomore Milestones Workshops” were designed to introduce these goals and concepts to second-years students. (Students who attend these workshops receive an updated degree requirement sheet, which informs them of what requirements they have/still need.) The Office of Career Development & Internships participates in the Milestones Workshops and students earn a CLIQ point for attendance.

Fall 2005 Sophomore
Milestones Workshops during Sophomore Advising Week:
|
Workshop Dates |
Attendance
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total
|
66 |
|
|
Spring 2006 Sophomore
Milestones Workshops during Sophomore Advising Week: March 20 - 24
|
Workshop Dates |
Attendance
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total
|
75 |
|
|
• Centralized information services: Provision of campus-wide information through Center (handouts, pamphlets, leaflets) and important internally authored and generated publications for use by students, faculty, and staff (QC Majors Book, Writing Intensive Course list; How to Choose a Major; A Guide to Academic Policies and Procedures; Freshman Handbook, etc.)
• Academic Progress Checks: outreach to juniors and seniors through a degree audit of their records by Center’s advisors. Nearly 3400 students with 75 or more completed credits received a personalized inventory of their academic records informing them of the status and completeness of their General Education Requirements, which include the Primary College Competencies, LASARs, writing intensive units, and the CUNY Proficiency exam, as well as any stops/ holds/issues on their records.
Academic Progress Checks for Academic 2005 – 2006
(completed by
|
|
|
|
Registration Group 6: equal to or greater than 75
credits and less than or equal to 89 credits |
1,032 |
|
Registration Groups 7 and 8, equal to or greater
than 90 credits. |
2,286 |
|
Total number of academic progress checks |
3318 |
• Long range academic planning to honor the CUNY mandate of CUNY to CUNY graduation within 60 credits by designing an advising sheet to plan out a student’s time at QC, taking into account prerequisites, sequential majors, college requirements remaining, etc.
• Second-semester Freshman Registration and Academic Planning Workshops; for first-semester freshmen who need assistance in choosing courses for their second semester at the College and long-term academic planning. These workshops are given two weeks prior to their registration day during "free hour." At this time, students are given a worksheet indicating which requirements are met and indicating those that are not yet satisfied. If an interest in a major is expressed at the time of sign-up, a major sheet is given with course suggestions to begin the major; students earn a CLIQ point for attendance.
Fall 2005 Freshman Workshops for Second-Semester Planning
Date of
Workshop Number
Attended
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
Total
|
240 |
Spring 2006 Workshops for Second-Semester Planning
Date of
Workshop Number
Attended
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
Total
|
90 |
Business and Liberal Arts
Program (BALA)
Ms. Barbara Sandler,
Director
BALA is a rigorous
interdisciplinary minor that connects liberal arts students to the world of
business. BALA combines study of arts
and sciences with exposure to basic business principles. The BALA curriculum reaffirms the importance
of the liberal arts, while offering a series of courses designed to bridge
study in the traditional liberal arts with a business career. BALA helps to
develop the creative thinking skills needed to succeed in any business
environment.
Currently there are 627
students enrolled in BALA: 379 females and 248 males. We have 1021 alumni who have completed the
BALA program.
We monitor each student’s
transcript every semester. We input all BALA coursework completed each semester
into our own database. BALA grades, BALA GPA and overall QC GPA are also put
into the database. Any student who falls below the honors criteria is called in
for a conference with me. We discuss
what problems they might be having and how we can work together to help them
stay in the program.
The major problem we have in maintaining this process is losing our budget. We need a part time computer expert to maintain and upgrade our database.
Financial Aid
Ms. Rena Kiawu Smith,
Director
Many
Freshman Year Initiative
Dr. Martin Braun, Director
The Freshman Year Initiative is a program of learning communities designed to enhance the freshmen experience. Each community is made up of approximately 40 students, four professors and a handful of mentors and teaching assistants. Students in the community take a series of three courses together during their first semester. By attending three classes as a group with the same people students begin to share experiences both in and out of the classroom. FYI professors also provide learning experiences in and out of the classroom that span the curriculum of these three courses. Some communities are targeted toward particular areas of study thereby connecting students early on in their college careers with major(s) and faculty. FYI provides special “reacting” classes to students in the second semester.
The Freshman Year Initiative is a
program open to all incoming freshmen at
The Freshman Year Initiative has
a proven track record of improving student retention and graduate rates at
Table 1: Fall 1996 FYI versus non-FYI after Spring
2001 semester (10 semesters)
|
|
N |
Grad |
denied |
pending |
enrolled |
Part-time |
Part-time grad |
Returning enrolled |
Returning grad |
trans |
mil |
Drop-out |
retention |
|
Non-FYI |
190 |
40.5 |
1.1 |
0 |
12.1 |
1.1 |
.0 |
2.1 |
.5 |
26 |
1.1 |
14.7 |
57.4 |
|
FYI |
320 |
45.3 |
1.6 |
.3 |
10.6 |
.9 |
.3 |
2.8 |
.9 |
22.5 |
.3 |
14.4 |
62.7 |
N=the number of students
All other numbers are percentages
Denied=filed for graduation but was denied
Pending=filed for graduation and still under review
Table 2: Fall 1997 FYI versus non-FYI after Spring
2001 semester (8 semesters)
|
|
N |
Grad |
denied |
enrolled |
Part-time |
Military |
Returning enrolled |
trans |
Drop-out |
retention |
|
Non-FYI |
127 |
17% |
1% |
38% |
2% |
0% |
2% |
24% |
16% |
61% |
|
FYI |
389 |
21% |
1% |
41% |
2% |
0%* |
3% |
17% |
15% |
68% |
*2 individuals joined the military
The outcomes represented in the
above tables have become consistent.
Table 3 also indicates that in many respects 1996 was an important year
in the development of FYI. It was during
this year that FYI received its own office with a stable office staff. As will be discussed later, the FYI office
plays an important role in the success of the program.
Table 3: 5 Year FYI Outcomes:
|
Year first enrolled |
n |
Dropped out |
Trans-ferred |
Military/ fire/ airlines/ police |
Still Enrolled |
graduated |
Retention (enrolled + graduated) |
Average GPA |
Average sems to grad |
|
1992 |
31 |
32% |
23% |
7% |
2% |
36% |
38% |
2.48 |
8.5* |
|
1993 |
121 |
24% |
12% |
2% |
16% |
46% |
62% |
2.64 |
9 |
|
1994 |
327 |
26% |
21% |
>1% |
14% |
39% |
53% |
2.45 |
8.5 |
|
1995 |
332 |
19% |
26% |
|
13% |
42% |
55% |
2.49 |
9 |
|
1996 |
319 |
14% |
24% |
0% |
14% |
48% |
62% |
2.65 |
8.5 |
|
1997 |
437 |
15% |
22% |
1% |
16% |
46% |
62% |
2.66 |
8.5 |
|
1998 |
445 |
13% |
20% |
1% |
20% |
46% |
66% |
2.70 |
8.5 |
FYI has also grown substantially over its history. Table 4 charts this growth.
Table 4: Enrollments in FYI
|
Year |
Total enrollment |
|
Fall 1992 |
31 |
|
Spring 1993 |
50 |
|
Fall 1993 |
121 |
|
Fall 1994 |
327 |
|
Fall 1995 |
337 |
|
Fall 1996 |
335 |
|
Fall 1997 |
410 |
|
Fall 1998 |
458 |
|
Fall 1999 |
393 |
|
Fall 2000 |
341 |
|
Fall 2001 |
671 |
|
Fall 2002 |
588 |
|
Fall 2003 |
587 |
|
Fall 2004 |
592 |
|
Fall 2005 |
710 |
As Table 3 indicates, during the growth phase through Fall 1998, the performance of the program was sustained along with the growth. Since the evaluation of FYI’s performance is done in terms of 5-year retention rates, there is presently no evaluation in terms of retention of the expansion that took place in Fall 2001, much less the expansion in Fall 2005.
During the past several years, FYI has developed two new programs: reacting pedagogy and the student mentor program.
The reacting pedagogy teaches historical controversies through students adopting roles. While the historical parameters of events are an important part of each scenario, the outcome is not determined. At the end of the unit, there are “winners” and “losers” and this leads to discussion of how the re-enactment replicated or deviated from the actual course of historical events. FYI has secured funding for this initiative, and has provided support and training for instructors who wish to use this pedagogy.
The student mentoring program was largely a student initiative that grew out of a cohort of students who informally helped around the FYI office. Funding was found to support these students to provide support to communities, act as liaisons between faculty, students, and staff, and to serve as guides for freshmen. Currently, every English 110 in FYI has a student mentor, and these mentors announce college events, assist Academic Advising in summer registration, work in the FYI office, and help direct new students to the college services that they need.
The successes of FYI since 1996 can be summarized as follows:
1. increase in retention
2. support for the reacting pedagogy
3. steady growth
4. development the student mentor program
These successes are due to several important efforts made by the administration to support FYI.
1. Providing FYI with an office suite large enough to run the program and mentor students
2. Providing FYI with computers
3. Hiring a full-time secretary for FYI
4. Continued funding.
FYI has faced several significant challenges, however. First, in 1999 a new course scheduling matrix was introduced without consulting FYI. This matrix made it difficult for FYI to coordinate communities, and for faculty within FYI communities to meet with one another. This schedule had the consequence of ending the frequent FYI faculty lunches that were crucial to the programs efforts at faculty development and the recruitment of new faculty to the program. Unfortunately, even with the change in the scheduling matrix, efforts at recruiting and developing faculty have not matched pre-1999 levels. Consequently, there are proportionately fewer full-time faculty participating in FYI, and this is compounded by pressure from the administration to expand the number of students served by FYI without a commensurate effort at recruiting and retaining faculty in the program.
This problem has been getting worse, and is noted by the student mentors. In crucial ways, the sense of community that now exists in FYI derives from the efforts of these mentors who have taken up this challenge as communalism among the faculty has dwindled. If the faculty development efforts of FYI can be rekindled in concert with the student mentors, then FYI will continue to be an exciting and dynamic program.
In the Fall 2005 semester, FYI was asked to expand beyond what its structure could manage. This involved the creation of “non-traditional” FYI communities known as “dyads.” These dyads were matched non-English 110 courses, and their students chose English 110 from a menu of options. The evaluation of these dyads by the student mentors and FYI staff is that they were not nearly as successful as traditional FYI communities. The student mentor supervisors reported that these “menu” English 110s sometimes had instructors who were hostile to the student mentors, and unaware that their section was associated with FYI. FYI is still struggling to figure out how to manage these dyads.
Expansion also created problems for the mentoring system. More sections meant the need for more mentors, which meant the need for more mentor supervisors, and the more supervisors there were, the more difficulty they had in scheduling meetings to coordinate their efforts. The mentor supervisors agree that if they can work as college assistants in the FYI office, it greatly increases their ability to work together as a team to manage the program. In the Fall 2005 semester, the supervisors that worked in the FYI office were able to coordinate with themselves much better than with the supervisors that worked elsewhere on campus.
It should be noted that the dyad idea was tried once before, in 1996. It was viewed as a failure then because it did not create a sense of community. The lesson that can be taken from the two attempts at dyads is that the zeal of administrators to expand a successful program must be accompanied by a commitment to provide the resources and support to sustain the expansion. FYI is successful because of committed faculty and student mentors, and expansion must be founded upon expanded numbers of participating faculty and mentors, not simply on a push for a paper expansion.
Finally, an on-going Achilles heel for FYI is the instability in the English 110 teaching staff. English 110 is staffed largely with adjuncts. Every summer, after the FYI communities are set, there is a large amount of turnover among these adjunct ranks, often with some adjuncts being hired at the last minute to teach FYI English 110s without any knowledge of FYI. Any effort that can be made to stabilize the instructor pool that teaches English 110 will greatly enhance FYI’s ability to prepare for the fall semester.
In sum, recommendations for FYI are:
1. Revive efforts at faculty development and recruitment
2. The College administration must recognize that expansion of FYI can only successfully occur with an expansion of efforts at faculty development and of the student
mentoring program—both of these will require additional resources.
3.
4. Stabilize the English 110 teaching pool.
There are a set of other issues that remain under discussion. Some want FYI to include all freshmen, yet the student mentors made it clear that there is a sizeable proportion of entering freshmen who do not want to be part of FYI communities. Others wish to extend FYI into the spring semester, or even the sophomore year. Yet, the further students progress toward graduation, the more difficult it is to identify courses that they all need and would want to take. In both of these cases, such expansions can only be entertained once the faculty development and recruitment issues have been resolved.
Health Professions Advisory Services
Members of the Committee on Health Professions are faculty and administrators who are willing to provide advisory information to students interested in a career in the health professions. They can be contacted through the HPAS office. Members assist the chair in writing the college letter of evaluation, provide opportunities for students to participate in mock interviews, and are a resource for students preparing for a career in the health professions.
The
health professions include medicine, dentistry, optometry, podiatry,
chiropractic, veterinary medicine and pharmacy, as well as nursing and its
specialties, occupational and physical therapy, and physician assistant. To
become a practitioner in any health profession, a student usually completes
pre-professional studies at a four-year college or university, and then applies
for admission to an accredited professional school.
Dr. Patricia O’Connor, Director
Each year, the
All
see a professional for academic advisement at least twice a year (prior to
registration).
The
required GPA at end of freshman year is 3.3; at end of sophomore and thereafter,
3.5. Students who do not meet these
standards are placed on probation. While
on probation they see an academic advisor three times during the semester. We also ask their professors for a progress
report once a semester. If the student
has not reached the mandated standard after a semester on probation, s/he is
dismissed from the CHC. S/he is not
dismissed from QC, of course, and some students continue to graduation in the
general College population.
I
currently have no info on whether males are disproportionately dismissed from
the CHC at QC
Honors and Scholarships
(Office of)
Dr. Ross Wheeler, Director
Honors programs are distinctive
in their emphasis on interdisciplinary study, which encourages students to
forge connections among the ideas introduced from different disciplines. This
process of forging connections helps students to develop an independence of
thought and a broadness of perspective in their education and on the
world. The Office of Honors and
Scholarships serves to support the Queens College Scholars and provides
advisement for students in the College’s honors programs, including the
Freshman Honors Program and the Queens College Divisional Honors Programs
(includes: Honors in the Humanities, Honors in the Mathematical and Natural
Sciences, and Honors in the Social Sciences.
The Office maintains a website with an extensive list of scholarships
and assists students in identifying and applying for awards that are
appropriate to their academic and career goals.
The Office mentors students for prestigious awards and scholarships by
reviewing their essays and holding mock interviews to help them hone their
interview skills.
Freshman Honors (Dr. Ross Wheeler, Director) sets the foundation for a student's education by providing a specially- designed liberal arts curriculum of interrelated classes that emphasize critical thinking, writing and presentation. The program incorporates experiences, such as visits to cultural events and institutions, and interactive student-centered pedagogies, which help students to integrate the work they complete in their honors classes. Students from all majors participate in Freshman Honors; the program therefore creates an interactive community where students share ideas across disciplines. On completing Freshman Honors, students may enter one of the divisional honors programs offered by the college.
Honors in the Humanities (Dr.
Richard McCoy, Director) is open to students in all majors on
campus, emphasizes the use of careful reading, critical writing and discussion
to study the origins of contemporary artistic and intellectual culture. In
small classes that are interdisciplinary in orientation, students focus on
classic works of literature, philosophy, and art in the context in which the
works emerged. Honors in the Humanities places great emphasis on the exchange
of ideas between students and faculty, and encourages students to examine the
implication of the ideas they explore in their classes on the contemporary
world around them. Students in this program enjoy access to an extensive honors
library, and receive special advisement and early registration priority.
Honors in the Mathematical and Natural Sciences (Dr. Wilma Saffran, Director) provides students with strong interests in math and science opportunities to develop close mentoring relationships with research faculty. Students in the program gain early access to research options and are encouraged through faculty guidance to pursue a research project to its successful conclusion. The program also provides a forum for interaction among students pursuing degrees in the natural and physical sciences and helps foster interaction among students with similar abilities and interests. Students who participate in Honors in Math and Natural Sciences frequently continue on to medical school or pursue other advanced degrees in the sciences.
"The objectives of Science Honors are to enhance the
undergraduate education of students who are interested in a career in the
mathematical and natural sciences by helping them choose a major, obtain early
access to research opportunities, pursue a research project to a successful
conclusion, and become participating members of the community of scholars at
40-60 per semester registered in HMNS courses.
As an honors program, retention is not really a
problem. Of the 260 students who have
participated over the past 6-8 years, 146 have already graduated or will do so
this year. Of the remaining 114
students, most are still registered at the college, 5 were second degree
students, 1 died, and 10 left without graduating (2 went to medical or
veterinary schools abroad).
For
the current semester: 56% female, 44%
male registered in HMNS courses For current year's graduates: 71% female, 29%
male completing the program
56% female, 44% male graduating overall.
Honors in the Social Sciences (Dr. Robin Rogers-Dillon, Director) introduces students to the traditions and methods of social science investigation. Students are able to design a course of study around a topic of special interest to them, and then to pursue the study of this topic through a series of theme-related courses taken from across the fields of the social sciences. The courses emphasize the critical analysis of social science research, and prepare students to design and conduct their own advanced research projects. Students in the program receive advisement and mentoring from teaching faculty members and from the program's director.
Labor Education Advancement Project (LEAP)
Dr. Gregory Mantsios,
Director
Since 1984, the LEAP program has offered matriculated students over the age of 25 the opportunity to enroll in a special sequence of courses that meet the College's general education requirements. These courses link liberal arts study to the life experiences of students, covering such topics as: Work, Class, and Culture; African American Literature; Latin American Literature; and Writing and the Literature of Work. The LEAP program establishes a strong learning community based on pro-active counseling, a unique curricular structure, and course content which draws on the life and work experience of students. The program provides access to a rigorous academic environment, while recognizing the special interests, needs and contributions of working students.
The
following "Mission Statement" is adapted from a Worker Education
Program document prepared in 2001: The
mission of the Worker Education Program is to provide educational opportunities
for working adult students and union members. This includes: a) offering
students a liberal arts education so that they may advance their careers and
enhance their lives, and b) providing students with opportunities to develop
their leadership skills so that they may play a more active role in their
communities and unions. As a field, Worker Education is committed to
democratizing higher education and making it more readily available to working
adults. Worker Education recognizes the importance of higher education
credentials for upward mobility and seeks to meet the educational needs of
workers seeking to adapt to technological, social, and economic change.
Queens
College Worker Education focuses on the liberal arts and especially the social
sciences, emphasizes the development of critical thinking skills, integrates
labor studies into its curriculum, encourages civic participation, and relies
on a close collaboration with labor unions. The program's commitment to access
to higher education is coupled with an equally deep commitment to providing
students with the level of academic support they will need to succeed in an
academically demanding environment. This requires special attention to
pedagogy, exemplary teaching, pro-active counseling, and an extensive tutoring
program for those who need it.
The
Worker Education Program serves approximately 600 undergraduate and graduate
students per semester at two locations. About 200 take classes at the program's
mid-Manhattan site; about 400 are in the LEAP program at the
Our
student population of working adults includes a large number of returning
students who may have been away from school for a considerable period of time.
To help such students remain in the program and continue on to graduation, we
provide substantial one-on-one counseling as well as a range of skills
development programs. At the
Adult
learners, such as our students, undertake education under very difficult
circumstances. Most have full-time jobs and demanding schedules, including
childcare, elder care and other personal obligations. These circumstances
coupled with financial burdens cause some students to "stop-out" one
or more times before finally graduating. A few, of course, are so overwhelmed
by these problems; they are forced to drop out altogether. Older students also
often start out with academic handicaps. They may have lost study skills
acquired earlier in life; or they may have had inadequate secondary education.
In cases like these, the CUNY assessment test has proved to be a very serious
obstacle. We offer free test preparation classes, but even with this support,
some students become discouraged and decide to abandon their educational goals.
Additional
resources in the following areas would greatly enhance our ability to promote
academic retention and academic success: additional full-time counseling
services; greater access to skills immersion courses and test-preparation
classes; more computers and computer lab space; resources to expand our on-site
library; more access to career-counseling services; more financial aid for
students and more flexible payment plans
The overwhelming majority
of Worker Education students are women.
As
of Spring 2006:
Campus
Undergrads: 31 full-time, 232 part-time
Campus
Graduates: 1 full-time, 64 part-time
Search for Education, Elevation, and Knowledge (SEEK)
Mr. Frank Franklin, Director
The SEEK Program provides a unique opportunity for academically
motivated students who need substantial financial assistance in order to attend
college.
SEEK is a
gateway to
Students entering the SEEK Program will benefit from the expertise of faculty and staff who for more than three decades have worked with culturally diverse student populations to address their many complex needs.
The curriculum is designed to strengthen academic skills while challenging students to realize and develop their full learning potential in a structured and supportive atmosphere. Supplemental instruction in various departments is provided to ensure successful completion of college-wide course offerings.
SEEK provides an excellent educational opportunity for students who wish to achieve academic success…a bachelor’s degree from Queens College and preparation for the challenges of the 21st century.