FRIDAY, MARCH 22: POSTER SESSION 2

6:00 - 8:00 pm, Dining Commons, CUNY Graduate Center (Fifth Avenue, between 34th and 35th Streets)

Please click on author name(s) or paper title to view the corresponding abstract.

Catherine Anderson (Northwestern University) • Recursion vs. layers: Production and perception of prosody in verb complement ambiguities   

Dale J. Barr (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) • The time course of mutual perspective in lexical activation and selection   

David Caplan (Harvard Medical School), Gloria Waters, Louise Stanczak (Boston University) & Nat Alpert (Massachusetts General Hospital) • Individual differences in rCBF responses to syntactic processing   

Katy Carlson (Northwestern University) • Use of pitch accents and pitch range in processing and production   

Evan Chen, Florian Wolf & Edward Gibson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) • Syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension   

Ioana Constantinescu & Roberto G. de Almeida (Concordia University) • The effect of verb transitivity preferences in sentence comprehension by LD readers   

Rick Dale & Morten H. Christiansen (Cornell University) • The emergence of coordinated phonological and prosodic cues for syntactic processing   

Michael Walsh Dickey & Cynthia K. Thompson (Northwestern University) • The resolution of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection   

Kathleen Eberhard, Matthias Scheutz, Kathleen Targowski & Jeffrey Spies (University of Notre Dame) • The effects of grammatical gender associations in one's native language on the processing of word representations in a second language: Evidence for interactive processing of lexical representations in bilingual memory   

Ivy V. Estabrooke (Georgetown University), Kristen Mordecai, Pauline Maki (National Institute of Aging) & Michael T. Ullman (Georgetown University) • Sex hormone effects on language   

Christian J. Fiebach, Ina Bornkessel & Angela D. Friederici (Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig) • Individual differences in the maintenance of preferred readings: Activation vs. inhibition   

Peter C. Gordon & Randall Hendrick (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) • NP interference in sentence processing   

Ana Gouvea, Colin Phillips & David Poeppel (University of Maryland, College Park) • Relative clause processing and extraposition in Brazilian Portuguese and English   

Christine Guerrera-Mahoney, Kenneth I. Forster & Janet Nicol (University of Arizona, Tucson) • Do semantics affect the syntactic processing of ambiguous words?   

Roberto Heredia (Texas A&M International University) & Jyotsna Vaid (Texas A&M University) • Processing code-switched sentences: Effects of semantic constraint, guest word phonology and guest word frequency   

Robin L. Hill & Roger P.G. van Gompel (University of Dundee) • Wrapping up the frequency effect  

John Ingram & Thu Nguyen (University of Queensland) • Prosodic cues for compounds and phrases in English, Japanese and Vietnamese   

Nenad Lovrić (Graduate Center, City University of New York) • It's the prosody that matters in Croatian

James Magnuson (Columbia University), Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard Aslin (University of Rochester) • Form class constraints on spoken word recognition   

Randi C. Martin & A. L. Inglis (Rice University) • Working memory at work: Semantic STM in sentence comprehension   

Sandra Muckel (Saarland University & University of Leipzig) & Thomas Pechmann (University of Leipzig) • Indirect prosodic constraints on gap identification in German   

Srini Narayanan (SRI International and ICSI, Berkeley) & Daniel Jurafsky (University of Colorado, Boulder) • Combining structure and probabilities in a Bayesian model of human sentence processing   

Erin L. O'Bryan (University of Arizona), David J. Townsend (Montclair State University) & Thomas G. Bever (University of Arizona) • Slips of the ear: A new way to investigate post-sentence auditory representations   
Despina Papadopoulou & Harald Clahsen (University of Essex) • The relative clause attachment ambiguity in Greek

Nohsook Park & Randi C. Martin (Rice University) • A contribution of phonological representations to immediate sentence recall   

Amy Perfors, Kalee Geidermann Magnani & Anne Fernald (Stanford University) • Speed and accuracy in on-line comprehension are related to vocabulary growth in 15- to 25-month-old children   

Douglas Rohde (Carnegie Mellon University & Massachusetts Institute of Technology) • Syntactic and semantic processing in a connectionist model of complex sentence comprehension and production   

Nicolas Ruh (University of Freiburg), Kerstin Klφckner (Saarland University) & Lars Konieczny (University of Freiburg) • Reassessing the ability of simple recurrent networks (SRNs) to account for verbal working memory performance   

Ralf Rummer, Johannes Engelkamp (Saarland University) & Lars Konieczny (University of Freiburg) • Subordination facilitates processing and memory of sentences   

Anthony Sanford (University of Glasgow), Andrew Stewart (Unilever Research Port Sunlight), Patrick Sturt (University of Glasgow) & Annie Archambault (Unilever Research Port Sunlight) • Text change detection   

Shari R. Speer (The Ohio State University), Amy J. Schafer (University of Hawaii) & Paul Warren (Victoria University of Wellington) • Wanna-contraction and prosodic disambiguation in US and NZ English  

Karsten Steinhauer (Georgetown University) • The P600/SPS reconsidered: Phonological influences   

Eivind Nessa Torgersen (University of Reading) • Temporal factors in perception of the voicing contrast: Immediate semantic effects on speech processing and the L2 learner   

Vivian Tsang & Suzanne Stevenson (University of Toronto) • The role of the syntax/semantics mapping in SLA: Computational experiments in verb classification   

Tessa Warren (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) & Ted Gibson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) • Evidence for a constituent-based distance metric in distance-based complexity theories    

Duane G. Watson & Edward Gibson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) • When does prosody influence parsing?   

Gloria Waters, Sasha Yampolsky (Boston University) & David Caplan (Harvard Medical School) • Syntactic processing under load and noise interference   

Masaya Yoshida (University of Maryland, College Park) • When negative statements are easier: Processing polarity items in Japanese   

UP
 Thursday, March 21: Poster Session 1
 Friday, March 22: Poster Session 2

Address for correspondence: sentproc@gc.cuny.edu.  
Page updated 03/09/02 .  Please contact us if you experience technical problems with these web pages.