POSTER SESSION 3 Saturday, March 25, 12:00-2:00, Concourse Level Lobby and Break-Out Rooms
Jennifer E. Arnold (UNC Chapel Hill), Carla Hudson Kam (UC Berkeley), & Michael K. Tanenhaus (U. Rochester) • Why is the speaker so disfluent? The role of attribution in the effect of disfluency on comprehension Markus Bader, Tanja Schmid & Jana Häussler (University of Konstanz) • Refining the HSPM´s Parsing Algorithm Emmanuel Bellengier (Université de Compiègne), Barbara Hemforth & Joël Pynte (Université d’Aix en Provence) • Going to CUNY — ah no — AMLaP in New York: The role of the reparandum in the comprehension of disfluencies C. Christine Camblin (UNC Chapel Hill), Peter C. Gordon (UNC Chapel Hill), and Tamara Y. Swaab (UC Davis) • Eye-tracking evidence reveals the moderating role of context on associative priming Philip Collard, Lucy J. MacGregor, Martin Corley (University of Edinburgh), & David I. Donaldson (University of Stirling) • Disfluency in speech affects listeners’ linguistic processing and attention: Evidence from event-related potentials Sarah C. Creel (University of Pennsylvania), Richard N. Aslin (University of Rochester), & Michael K. Tanenhaus (University of Rochester) • Talker variation influences the early moments of lexical access Fernanda Ferreira & Brett Guth (Michigan State University) • Effects of disfluency placement and severity on comprehension of garden-path sentences Susanna Flett, Holly Branigan, Martin Pickering & Antonella Sorace (University of Edinburgh) • The influence of lexical factors on word order production Foucart, A. (University of Edinburgh, and University of Provence) and Frenck-Mestre, C. (CNRS, University of Provence) • Processing of adjectives in French as first and second language: Evidence from ERPs Michael C. Frank (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) • Word segmentation as word learning: Interactions between statistical cues and word stress in the segmentation of novel, synthesized speech Kumiko Fukumura & Roger P.G. van Gompel (University of Dundee) • Choosing anaphoric expressions in production: The role of semantics Micah B. Goldwater (University of Texas at Austin) & Jeffrey T. Runner (University of Rochester) • The role of representation in representational noun phrases Martin Hackl & Ben Acland (Pomona College) • Investigating verification procedures for quantified statements Joy E. Hanna (Oberlin College) & Richard J. Gerrig (SUNY Stony Brook) • The structural preferences of novel denominal verbs Jesse Harris, Liina Pylkkänen, Brian McElree (NYU) & Steven Frisson (University of Birmingham) • Interpretation of concealed questions: MEG and eye-tracking data Annabel J. Harrison, Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering (University of Edinburgh) & Rob J. Hartsuiker (Universiteit Gent) • The dual of the twins and the siblings: When is the dual easier to process in Slovene? Sarah L. Haywood & Holly P. Branigan (University of Edinburgh) • The impact of personal experience on understanding addressees’ communication needs Carla L. Hudson Kam (University of California, Berkeley) • The use of uh and um in native English-speaking 3- and 4-year olds: Do they know the difference? Carrie N. Jackson (The Pennsylvania State University) • The sentence-level processing of case markings and word order by L2 learners of German Valesca Kooijman (F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics), Tineke Snijders, Peter Hagoort (F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging) & Anne Cutler (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics) • Word segmentation from continuous speech: The "Foreign Language Effect" Ellen Lau, Katya Rozanova, & Colin Phillips (University of Maryland, College Park) • Differential effects of lexical surface frequency on reading times in syntactic context Jennifer Mack, Maria Mercedes Piñango (Yale University) & Ray Jackendoff (Tufts University) • Semantic compositional processes in the interpretation of light verbs Helen Majewski (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) • Reciprocals, processing and event structure Laura Matzen & Susan Garnsey (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) • ERP evidence about the role of plausibility in the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences Corey T. McMillan, Susannah Moat, Martin Corley (University of Edinburgh) & Robin Lickley (Queen Margaret University College) • Toward a unified model of speech production: Articulatory evidence of cognitive manipulations Séverine Millotte (EHESS /ENS / CNRS, University of Geneva), Roger Wales (La Trobe University), Emmanuel Dupoux & Anne Christophe (EHESS /ENS / CNRS) • Performing a syntactic analysis of spoken sentences without a lexicon Jo Molle and Alison Sanford (University of Strathclyde) • Disfluencies affect subsequent word processing Joanna Musial, David J. Townsend, Milton S. Seegmiller, Mary Call, & Simona Mancini (Montclair State University) • When do shifts in aspectual interpretation occur? Andriy Myachykov and Simon Garrod (University of Glasgow) • Visually mediated speech production in English and Russian Polly O’Rourke (University of Arizona) • The gender congruency effect in bare noun production in Spanish Sara Peters & Amit Almor (University of South Carolina) • The repeated-name penalty observed in reference to concrete objects Fabrizio Pizzioli, Bruno Rossion, Marie-Anne Schelstraete (Université Catholique de Louvain) & Hiroko Nakano (Saint Mary’s College of California) • Semantic plausibility effect on the integration of direct and indirect complements: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence Josée Poirier (University of California, San Diego & San Diego State University), Lewis Shapiro (San Diego State University), David Swinney (University of California, San Diego) & Rebecca Rothman (San Diego State University) • Unaccusatives in ellipsis: processing of covert material Whitney Anne Postman (National Institutes of Health), Jeffrey Solomon (Medical Numerics, Inc.), Joe Maisog (Georgetown University), Sandra Bond Chapman (University of Texas at Dallas), Siri Tuttle (University of Alaska Fairbanks), Monica R. Christian (Rehabilitation Specialists, Haledon, New Jersey), Linda Milosky (Syracuse University) & Allen Braun (National Institutes of Health) • Deconstructing discourse: A PET study of narrative production Stefanie Regel, Thomas C. Gunter & Angela D. Friederici (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences) • Processing of ironic and non-ironic sentences examined with ERPs Oren Sadeh-Leicht (Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS) • Magnitude estimation as a tool for the study of processing difficulty Rosa Sánchez-Casas, Pilar Ferré, March Guasch, Jose E. García-Albea & Josep Demestre (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) • Effects of semantic similarity in facilitation and interference experimental paradigms Katja Suckow (Humboldt University Berlin) & Shravan Vasishth (Potsdam University) & Richard L. Lewis (University of Michigan) • Interference and memory overload during parsing of grammatical and ungrammatical embeddings: Cross-linguistic evidence for encoding and retrieval interference Benjamin Swets, Fernanda Ferreira, & Erik M. Altmann (Michigan State University) • “Where was I?”: A psycholinguistic investigation of interruptions to language production Kristen Syrett (Northwestern University), Jeffrey Lidz (University of Maryland) & Christopher Kennedy (University of Chicago) • The semantic typology of gradable adjectives: Experimental evidence from adult and child language Meylysa Tseng, Jung-Hee Kim & Benjamin Bergen (University of Hawai'i at Manoa) • Can we simulate negation? The simulation effects of negation in English intransitive sentences [WITHDRAWN] Miki Uetsuki (University of Tokyo), Kazushi Maruya (The Jikei University, JSPS) & Takao Sato (University of Tokyo) • Processing of garden-path sentences is impaired at longer phrase durations Eva Van Assche, Wouter Duyck, & Robert Hartsuiker (Ghent University) • Bilingual visual word recognition in a sentence context: Evidence from eyetracking Heather K. J. van der Lely (University College London) & Elisabeth Fonteneau (Goldsmiths College, University of London) • ERP signatures in language-impaired children reveal a domain-specific neural correlate for syntactic dependencies Shravan Vasishth, Heiner Drenhaus (Potsdam University), Richard L. Lewis (University of Michigan) & Douglas Saddy (Potsdam University) • Processing constraints on negative and positive polarity Tessa Warren & Kerry McConnell (University of Pittsburgh) • Effects of building and maintaining syntactic predictions on eye-movements in reading Andrea Weber & Matthew W. Crocker (Saarland University) • Top-down anticipation versus bottom-up lexical access: Which dominates eye movements in visual scenes? Anna R. Weighall & Michelle Thompson (Sheffield Hallam University) • On still being led down the kindergarten-path: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities Hongoak Yun, Gail Mauner, & Jean-Pierre Koenig (University at Buffalo) • Anticipation vs. integration of syntactically infrequent but semantically obligatory arguments Eytan Zweig & Liina Pylkkänen (NYU) • Early effects of morphological complexity in visual word processing: an MEG study [ PAPERS ] [ THURSDAY POSTERS ] [ FRIDAY POSTERS ] [ SATURDAY POSTERS ] | 
