QUEENS COLLEGE
SECONDARY
SCIENCE EDUCATION
Student
Teacher Observations
There are five parts to every lesson.
·
Thinking
about the content and the pedagogy
·
Planning the
lesson
·
Teaching the
lesson
·
Talking
about the lesson with your cooperating teacher and/or the visiting college
professor
·
Thinking
about and writing one’s reflections on the lesson.
These five components will be part of every
lesson you teach. For the lessons
observed by the college professor, there is yet one more step: the Evaluation.
For your observations by the college
professor there are submissions that you must make in relation to the lesson
tied to the steps above. The submissions
are all graded and all have time deadlines.
I.
Pre-lesson Thoughts. These
must be written and submitted to the observer no later than 10:00 p.m. two days
before your observation. The Form I provided
in this packet must be used to detail your pre-lesson thoughts. (15 points)
II.
The Lesson Plan. This
must be written and submitted to the observer at the same time as the
pre-lesson thoughts. A sample of the
format required for these lesson plans is in this packet (see II.) (15 points)
III.
Teaching the Lesson (20 points)
IV.
Overall Reflection on the Lesson. This
is to be written after the discussion with the college professor and is to be
submitted within 7 days after the lesson is taught. The Post-Lesson Thoughts, Form III, provided
in this packet, must be used for this submission. (40 points)
V.
Self-Assessment. This two-page
assessment, Forms IV A and IV B, must be completed and submitted at the same
time as the reflection. (10 points)
VI.
Evaluation. When the college professor who observed you
has received all of your submissions for a particular lesson the Evaluation for
the lesson will be completed and you will receive a copy of the completed
Evaluation Form (see Form V in the packet.)
Planning for
Scientific Understanding
I. Pre-Lesson Thoughts
To be emailed to the college observer by 10:00pm two days before the
observation.
Name: Observation #:
1) Provide relevant context information about the school, your specific classroom and its attributes and resources or lack thereof.
2) Describe the knowledge you have of these students specifically:
(a) What they already know, what they can do, and what they are learning to do.
(b) Their backgrounds, their interests, and their day-to-day practices and experiences.
3) Describe how this lesson fits into the unit you are teaching?
4) Describe your goals for the students and the central focus of the lesson.
5) (a) Identify one language function from Analysis, Explanation, Interpretation, and Justification that is essential for student learning in this lesson.
(b)What vocabulary and/or symbols will you introduce in this lesson?
(c)Will you employ syntactical considerations or discourse to promote your chosen language function for this lesson? Describe how you will promote the language function/
6) Describe the pedagogical strategies you are thinking of using for this lesson and why they are appropriate for this lesson and this class.
7) Describe the methods you will employ to assess and monitor student learning?
8) Cite and describe the sources you are using to get ideas for this lesson.
II. The
Lesson Plan
(To be submitted with the pre-lesson
thoughts)
Key: Blue words you will have in your prepared
plan; pink words are examples of how you would write those sections for the
Pressure in Gasses lesson; Green letters guide you as to what is to go in that
section.
Lesson Plan Observation #
Date: Grade Level: School:
Topic: Pressure in Gases
Aim: To teach students the concept of atmospheric pressure and units of pressure.
Objectives: By the end of the lesson students will be able to
(a) Describe how a barometer works
(b) Work with the units mm of mercury, atmospheres and PSI and be able to convert from one to the other
NYS Standards: List them with the appropriate # and statement
Do Now: (2-4 minutes) This should either focus on a review of past work, or a reminder of skills needed for this lesson. It is to be a quiet time where students work alone.
Motivation: (2 minutes max) This should be thought of as “How am I going to introduce the lesson to capture the interest of the students at the outset?” It may be a series of questions, a cartoon, a short film, a link to an article on the web, a newspaper clipping, a quick demo or virtually anything else. For the lesson on pressure in gases, a couple of ideas:
(a) Show a picture of a barometer and ask who can tell you what it is and what it does.
(b) “On Sunday Nov 4th, weather forecasters were saying that the storm approaching New York was going to be very serious because the pressure of the weather system was 740.” What bearing does the number 740 have on the prediction of a severe storm?
Development of the lesson. (Mini-Lesson) (15 minutes) This should be written as a numbered sequence of exactly what you are going to do. It should include pivotal questions you plan to ask, examples you are going to use, specific vocabulary you are going to introduce, equivalence relations you will cover, demonstrations you are planning and how you will incorporate good scientific practice into the lesson. The development section should be detailed enough so that one of your peers could physically pick up the lesson plan and deliver the lesson as you have envisaged it.
Student Activity. After the mini lesson there will be some form of activity to reinforce what has been taught. You must detail how you are going to assess the students throughout the activity for purposes of further guiding the instruction. If you plan on a hands-on activity you should list the materials and technology you are going to use, and give details on how you are going to execute the activity; for example, how you are going to divide the students into groups.
Summary and Assessment. This may be in the form of a group summary
given by individual students, a series of oral questions by the teacher, simply
a statement of what has been covered, a short quiz, a short statement written
by each student, etc. Many times the
summary and assessment will be one and the same. If there is no assessment built into the
summary then you must detail how otherwise you are going to assess how well you
have achieved your objectives, how you guided students’ conceptual understanding
and how you encouraged students to use evidence-based arguments in their oral
and/or written responses. Include copies
of all assessment documents you plan to use.
III. Post-Lesson
Thoughts
To be emailed to the college observer no later than 7 days after the
lesson was taught.
Name: Observation #:
1. Goals:
Consider your original goals for the lesson. Did you accomplish these goals? How do you know? Were there differences in qualitative and quantitative learning patterns for individual students?
2. The lesson’s objectives, standards, and content all align to enhance student learning and engagement.
3. Language understanding and use.
Were students able to use the language and symbols you introduced and used during the lesson? Explain you answer.
4. Teacher feedback during the lesson
How did your feedback help students in the learning process? Were students able to generalize beyond a specific instance?
5. Monitoring/Regulatory/Assessing
What were some of the thoughts you had during the lesson that caused you to make the decisions you made?
6. Summary/Assessment
What did the summary/assessment part of your lesson tell you about the students’ learning?
7. Supervisor’s suggestions:
What points were brought to your attention at the Post-lesson conference?
8. The lesson plan
What changes would you make to your lesson plan if you were to teach this lesson again?
9. Other reflection points.
IV A. Self-Assessment Summary
To be emailed with the Post-Lesson Thoughts
and Assessment
Name: School:
Observation #: Co-op Teacher:
Grade: Class/Ability Group:
Lesson Topic:
Date:
Strong Points of the lesson—Discuss the following three components:
1. Planning for instruction
2. Instructing and engaging
students
3. Assessing student learning
Areas for Improvement:
1.
2.
3.
Assessment Tools: Check that description which best describes
each tool for promoting student learning during this lesson.
1 Questioning
__needs improvement,
__adequate, __helpful to me the teacher
2 Feedback: __needs improvement, __adequate, __helpful to me the teacher
3
End of lesson
summary or formal assessment:
__needs improvement, __adequate, --helpful to me the teacher
Student Electronic Signature:
IV B. Self-Assessment Rating of Instructional Practice
INDICATORS EVALUATION
|
N/O |
Emerging |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Justification |
1) Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
a.)
Lesson has a
central focus |
|
|
|
|
|
b.)
Standards and
learning objectives address science concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
c.)
Lesson plans
are sequenced appropriately |
|
|
|
|
|
d.)
Identifies
students’ prerequisite knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
e.)
Develops
activities to support students’ science learning |
|
|
|
|
|
f.)
Supports
science development through the use of academic language |
|
|
|
|
|
g.)
Employs
appropriate methods to monitor student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
h.)
Planning
strategies are supported by principles from research and/or theory |
|
|
|
|
|
2.) Instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
a.)
Fosters a
positive learning environment |
|
|
|
|
|
b.)
Employs
appropriate methods to engage students in learning |
|
|
|
|
|
c.)
Uses
appropriate methods to advance student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
d.)
Uses
appropriate strategies for whole-class instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
e.)
Accommodates
students who need greater instructional support |
|
|
|
|
|
f.)
Instructional
strategies are supported by principles from research and/or theory |
|
|
|
|
|
3.) Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
a.)
Aligns
standards, objectives, content, and assessment measures |
|
|
|
|
|
b.)
Provides
appropriate evaluation criteria to analyze student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
c.)
Guides student
learning through the use of varied feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
d.)
Gathers
evidence of students’ use and understanding of academic language |
|
|
|
|
|
e.)
Assessment
strategies are supported by principles from research and/or theory |
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluation Scale
3- Advanced Performance
2- Proficient Performance
1- Emerging Performance
N/O- Not Observed or Not Applicable
Student’s Electronic Signature: Supervisor’s Electronic Signature:
V. Evaluation of Teacher Cognitions
in Teaching
Name: Observation
#:
INDICATORS EVALUATION
|
N/O |
Emerging |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Justification |
1) Pre-Lesson
Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
a.)
Lesson has a
central focus |
|
|
|
|
|
b.)
Standards and
learning objectives address science concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
c.)
Lesson plans
are sequenced appropriately |
|
|
|
|
|
d.)
Identifies
students’ prerequisite knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
e.)
Develops
activities to support students’ science learning |
|
|
|
|
|
f.)
Supports
science development through the use of academic language |
|
|
|
|
|
g.)
Employs
appropriate methods to monitor student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
h.)
Planning
strategies are supported by principles from research and/or theory |
|
|
|
|
|
2.) Instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
a.)
Fosters a
positive learning environment |
|
|
|
|
|
b.)
Employs
appropriate methods to engage students in learning |
|
|
|
|
|
c.)
Uses
appropriate methods to advance student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
d.)
Uses
appropriate strategies for whole-class instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
e.)
Accommodates
students who need greater instructional support |
|
|
|
|
|
f.)
Instructional
strategies are supported by principles from research and/or theory |
|
|
|
|
|
3.) Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
a.)
Aligns
standards, objectives, content, and assessment measures |
|
|
|
|
|
b.)
Provides
appropriate evaluation criteria to analyze student learning |
|
|
|
|
|
c.)
Guides student
learning through the use of varied feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
d.)
Gathers
evidence of students’ use and understanding of academic language |
|
|
|
|
|
e.)
Assessment
strategies are supported by principles from research and/or theory |
|
|
|
|
|
4) Conference Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Recognize
Strengths & Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
|
5) Post-lesson |
|
|
|
|
|
a.) Written Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
b.) Self-assessment Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
c.) Self-assessment Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
Components |
Target Responses |
Pre-lesson Thoughts (15 points) |
The candidate addressed the three tasks of
planning, instruction, and assessment in the design of the lesson. All questions are answered clearly,
insightfully, and thoroughly. Each
successive observation is updated showing evidence of new information about
the students and the setting. |
Lesson Plan (15 points) |
The Aim and Objectives of the lesson are
clearly and appropriately stated using an appropriate format. Appropriate standards for the lesson are
identified and support the lesson’s objectives. The Do Now is appropriate. The Motivation creates a need to learn that
permeates the lesson. The Development
is coherent so that the scientific ideas are developed in a logical and
sequential manner. The objectives for
student learning have been accomplished. |
Teaching Performance (20 points) |
The implementation of the lesson plan (1)
reflected an environment that promoted student-centered instruction, (2)
incorporated worthwhile scientific tasks and technology that motivated
students and challenged their thinking, (3) demonstrated inquiry-based
teaching strategies, and (4) highlighted discourse that involved students in
explaining, questioning, and responding to important scientific ideas, all of
which reflected goals that addressed and contributed to students’ scientific,
social, psychological, and emotional needs and development. |
Reflection (40 points) |
All nine items of the Post-lesson Thoughts
and Assessment are described clearly, insightfully, and thoroughly. All of the elements of the lesson that were
critiqued at the post-lesson conference are addressed accurately, and in
detail. Evidence of knowledge about,
and interest in continual improvement, is presented. |
Self-Assessment (10 points) |
The main strong points and areas for
improvement are clearly and accurately summarized in keeping with the ideas
discussed at the post-lesson conference.
The student has a realistic self-assessment of the lesson. |
Points are deducted for each item
that is either not clearly explained, inaccurate, too general, or missing
completely.
Pre-lesson (15) |
Lesson Plan (15) |
Observation: The Lesson (20) |
Post-lesson (40) |
Self-Assessment (10) |
Total (100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPERVISOR’S OVERALL SUMMARY: