SEYS 777 Research
Seminar in Science Education (I)
A. COURSE DESCRIPTION – 2 hr. plus conf.; 3 cr. Prerequisites: Initial Certificate. Matriculation in MS in Secondary Education and completion of a minimum of 20 credits in the MS degree program.
B. COURSE GOALS/OBJECTIVES
This course is offered by the Science Education Program in the Department of Secondary Education, part of the Education Unit at Queens College. The Education Unit seeks to promote Equity, Excellence, and Ethics in urban education and is committed to developing competencies in all teacher preparation and other education professional candidates that will enable them to:
At the end of this course, graduate students will have demonstrated competency in the following 7 areas:
1. Understanding the nature of social/scientific research and the scientific processes
applied in research. (Excellence)
2. Understanding contrasting types of research and sources of data used in each type.
(Excellence, Ethics)
3. Selecting and refining a research proposal. (Equity, Excellence, Ethics) Note: Research proposals commonly embody one or more Core Values.
4. Locating published research. (Excellence)
5. Interpreting and summarizing published research. (Excellence)
6. Presenting the results of a review of published research. (Equity, Excellence, Ethics)
7. Writing a review paper in an area of published research. (Excellence, Ethics)
This course is the first of two consecutive courses in research techniques and research study findings in science education. The objective is to introduce graduates to tools used in research and study how data is used to look more carefully at cause and effect in teaching and learning. In the process, graduates will identify an area of research interest to investigate and write a review of the literature in their chosen topic. There are well-designed, published journal articles in a wide range of areas related to teaching and learning.
We will discuss common models used in research. Quantitative studies that rely on numerical data analysis and qualitative studies that rely more heavily on observational, descriptive measures will be reviewed and analyzed. Through examining published studies in science/instruction in middle and high school, we will learn to recognize different types of goals and outcomes of each model.
Participants may conduct an alternative to a classical research study in Semester 2 (e.g. an action research project) based on approval by the instructor.
C. REQUIRED PURCHASES: TEXTBOOK(S), SUPPLIES, COMPUTER ACCOUNTS, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Text (Required):Mertler,C.A.and
Charles,C.M.
(2011). Introduction to Educational Research – 7e. New York:
Longman IBSN 10: 0-13-701344-2
Schedule of (Mertler and
Charles) readings
Galvan,
J.L.
(2009). Writing Literature Reviews - 4e. Los Angeles CA:
Pryczak Publishing IBSN 1-884585-86-8
References:
Gabel, D.L. (1993). Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and
Learning. New York: Macmillan.
Burnaford,G.,Fischer,J.,Hobson,D. (1996). Teachers Doing Research:
Practical Possibilities. New Jersey: Erlbaum Asso.
Glass, G., Hopkins, K. (1996). Statistical Methods in Education
and Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Also: Reference Desk at Rosenthal Library - Course SEYS 777 for additional texts and sample literature reviews
Supplies and/or
tools, hardware: You will need access to a computer with an
Internet connection to do the online assignments. You
should have ear phones that you can connect to your computer
in order to listen to webcasts and podcasts.
What to do if BlackBoard
and the QC website are down: If BlackBoard is down,
please check our QC course website at and also check
your QC email If all of these are down, go to our
Google grouphttp://groups.google.com/group/seys777-fall2012
and check your gmail email for announcements about
alternative arrangements.
Tips
and Advice for Students Taking an Online or Hybrid
Course
D. DISCUSSION TOPICS – TENTATIVE SCHEDULE *
Active class participation in
discussions of focus topics is expected.
Week 1 - 8/28/2012
- FACE TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Course overview
Week 2 - 9/4/2012
- ONLINE - Resources in educational
research
Tasks to be completed during Week 2:
Assigned Reading:
(Mertler and Charles) Read Chaps 1: Educational research and 4: Locating published research.
Week 3 - 9/11/2012 - FACE TO
FACE IN KIELY 115 - Using the library for science education
research
Week 6 - 10/2/2012 - ONLINE - An overview of types of educational research and data sources - Chap. 2;
Activities:
Assigned Reading: (Please post any questions or comments on the chapters on the discussion board in BlackBoard)
(Galvin):
- Chapter 1 - Writing Reviews of Academic Literature
- Chapter 2 - Considerations in Writing Reviews for Specific Purposes
Week 7 - 10/9/2012 - FACE TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Selecting, refining and proposing a topic for research - (Mertler Chap. 3)
Activities:
Prepare a list of possible areas of research interests. (Post on the discussion board)
Considerations:
What aspects of the topic/problem interest you?
What are you hoping to find out?
What use will the study be to you as a teacher?
Policy review of protocols for conducting research on human subjects.
Complete the planning of your science education research activity by posting answers to the following questions on the discussion board:
1. A possible topic or problem I am thinking of researching is:
2. The type of research that seems most appropriate to my chosen topic
is (check one):
ethnographic research
historical research
descriptive research
correlational research
action research
evaluation research
causal-comparative research
experimental research
3. The reason that I chose that particular type of research, and why I
think it is most appropriate for my topic, is:_____________
4. Other types of research (if any) in the list above that might also seem
appropriate for my topic include: _______________
5. Based on my responses to #3 and #4, criticisms by experienced
researchers of my topic using these approaches might include: __________
6. Based on my responses to the preceding questions, I believe that
________________________ research would be most
appropriate.
You will complete your research study
in SEYS 778. Please read the links below to see what
types of projects need IRB approval:
Assigned reading:
(Galvin):
- Chapter 3 - Selecting a Topic and Identifying Literature for Review
- Chapter 4 - General Guidelines for Analyzing Literature
Week 8 - 10/16 - ONLINE - Designing a research project - Chap. 6
Science News
Assignment: Work on your draft
proposal. Prepare a clear, succinct, worded title of your
study. Include a description of the research (problem you are
investigating, type of research it will be, a working hypothesis
(if needed) and specific ways you plan to locate biographical
information for your literature review. Include a list of
keywords, terms (DESCRIPTORS) used in your search to locate
studies or published data.
Present a 5- minute description to class for discussion
and feedback. Post on the discussion board in Blackboard, submit
as an assignment, and share as a Google doc with
qcscied@gmail.com. Save backups in various locations.
Assigned reading:
(Mertler and Charlers) - Chapter 6 - Designing a Research project
(Galvin):
- Chapter 5- Analyzing Quantitative Research Literature
- Chapter 6 - Analyzing Qualitative Research Literature
Week 9 - 10/23/2012 -
FACE TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Research Project Updates,
feedback and discussion, Introduction to statistics
Assigned Reading:
(Mertler and Charles):
- Interpreting and summarizing published research - Chaps. 5 & 8
(Galvin):
- Chapter 7 - Building Tables to Summarize Literature
- Chapter 8 - Synthesizing Literature Prior to Writing a Review
Week 10
- 10/30/2012 - ONLINE
- Example of historical research topic - pick team
assignments post on the wiki tool in Blackboard
Assigned reading:
(Galvin):
- Chapter 9 - Guidelines for Writing a First Draft
- Chapter 10 - Guidelines for Developing a Coherent Essay
- Chapter 11 - Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
Week 11 - 11/6/2012 - FACE
TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Recovery from Hurricane
Sandy, lit review and proposal updates and question and answers
(I will try to video this class for those who can't make
it. The link will be posted to the Google group and in
BlackBoard and via email)
Assigned reading:
(Galvin):
- Chapter 12 - Incorporating Feedback and Refining the First Draft
- Chapter 13 - Preparing a Reference List
- Chapter 14 - Comprehensive Self-Editing Checklist for Refining the Final Draft
Week 12 - 11/13/2012 - ONLINE - Continue working on proposal and lit review - submit questions, problems to instructor
Science news:
Tasks for Week 12:
1) On the Mertler book website, read through the following for chapters 3, 4, and 5:
- Chapter objectives
- Lecture outline in the form of PowerPoint slides
- Multiple choice
- Weblinks from the Mertler book website:
2) Post an updated version of your proposal and a list of the references you have collected so far
3) Prepare to lead your team discussion next week.
4) You should be working on the rough draft of your literature review paper.
Week 13 - 11/20/12 – FACE TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Types of research studies – Experimental, quasi-experimental, and
single subject research - Chap.
13; Mixed-methods research designs – Chap. 14, Non-experimental
quantitative
Science news:
Each team will lead a discussion on the topics specified
(maximum time per team is 15 minutes). We are discussing
materials from "Introduction to Educational Research" by Craig
Mertler and C.M. Charles (7e) and (6e), so each group should
have at least one copy of each edition.
Continue work on literature
review in class and proposals
Useful technology links:
Week 14 - 11/27/2012 - CLASS IS
ONLINE THIS WEEK - Continue to work on literature review
and proposals
Week 15 - 12/4/2012 - FACE
TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Assignment
2 - Final Proposal Due
Week 16 - 12/11/2012 - FACE TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - Presentation of oral summaries of literature review and proposal, with discussion, questions and feedback. Refer to schedule (TBA). Review of Literature paper due week of Finals.
Scoring guidelines for literature review presentations
Week 17 - 12/18 /07 - FACE
TO FACE IN KIELY 115 - IMPORTANT: WE WILL MEET FROM
6:15PM TO 8:15PM Finals Week – Review of the Literature,
due. No extensions.
*
Teams and assignments will be formed after the start of the
semester.
E. ASSIGNMENTS, DUE DATES AND GRADING PLAN
1. Preparation and participation. Due to the nature of the research seminar, preparation and
participation in weekly discussions are vital to ensure successful attainment of objectives this
semester. Chapter readings are listed for each week. Additional assignments will be completed
through team presentations. Attendance mandatory. 25 points
2. Research proposal. A research proposal is a description of the research or study you plan to
conduct in Semester 2. Generally a proposal includes: a title that clearly describes the intended
research or study, a discussion of the research sampling, design, methodology and calendar
schedule for carrying out the research or study, and a description of how the data will be
analyzed. In some cases, a hypothesis is included that defines the study more precisely. The
shaping of your research proposal will be discussed and assessed throughout the coming
months. 10 points
3. Presentation of review of research. Prior to the end of the semester, you will have
opportunities to present the results of your literature search and proposal to your peers for
feedback and refinement. A formal presentation is given in the last weeks of the first semester.
25 points
4. A 15+ page review of research paper summarizing the most recent developments in an area of
interest to you. In research parlance, this paper is called a review of the literature. The purpose
of this bibliographic-cited research is to give the researcher (you) a deeper understanding of the
findings in a field of research or professional interest. The review should cite a minimum of 10
related articles (studies) and include an overview of major findings, conclusions and/or points
of dispute in the chosen area of research. 50 points
Accordingly, a final grade in this
course is based on the following criteria:
Assignment |
Points |
Assignment 1 - review of a science
education research article |
10 |
Assignment 2 - Research proposal | 10 |
Assignment 3 - Review
of the literature presentation |
25 |
Assignment 4 - Review of literature paper | 50 |
Participation |
10 |
Total possible points: 105
points
F. FIELDWORK REQUIREMENTS
Attendance at a professional science teacher meeting is required at the New York Academy of Sciences (NYC), Saturday Science Conference (NYC) or research-centered center. Written analysis – 1 page. Suggested outline (format) will be distributed.
G. CUNY POLICY ON ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
Academic dishonesty is prohibited in The City University of New York and is punishable by penalties, including failing grades, suspension, and expulsion as provided at:
http://qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/provost/policies/index
H. ADA Statement
Students with disabilities needing academic accommodation should: (1) register with and provide documentation to the Special Services Office, Kiely 171; (2) bring a letter to the instructor indicating the need for accommodation and what type. This should be done during the first week of class. For more information about services available to Queens students contact: Pratik Patel, Special Services Office; 171 Kiely Hall; 718 997-5870 (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). E-mail address: pratik_patel@qc.edu
I. USE OF STUDENT WORK
All teacher education programs in New York State undergo periodic reviews by accreditation agencies and the state education department. For these purposes, samples of students’ work are made available to those professionals conducting the review. Student anonymity is assured under these circumstances. If you do not wish to have your work made available for these purposes, inform the professor know before the start of the second class.
J. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Some topics of potential research interest:
Teacher instruction and:
Cooperative learning in science, science achievement (any or all grades), cognitive development and learning, constructivist pedagogy or related areas: inquiry/discovery lessons in science, critical thinking or problem-solving, student-centered performance assessment, computers/learning technologies in science instruction, alternate teaching methods (e.g. “workshop model”), student learning styles, team taught-approach to science instruction, reading/writing in science, basic skills and science learning, special needs students, diverse student populations.
Issues in science education:
Science standards and practice in science education, correlations between variables like classroom environment, student attitude, gender, teacher factors, student background, student performance, cultural factors, issues in science curriculum reform, gender inequities in science, inquiry, discovery and/or "hands-on" science and achievement, the effect of National Science Education Standards on science instruction and achievement ((7-12), effects of instructional approach and learning styles on student perceptions and achievement.
Topics or issues in science to enrich the secondary curriculum:
New frontiers in…(e.g. biotechnology research, stem cell research); Ethnics and science (e.g. cloning ); History of science(e.g. Newtonian and quantum mechanics); The nature and philosophy of science (e.g. Creationism or Evolution?, Paranormal phenomena); Other (see me).
Note: Topics are broad categories that may contain an array of suitable subtopics to investigate. Individual studies will be more narrowly focused and have a deeper foundation in one area.